open collaboration

From AboutUs

Jump to: navigation, search

From WhoWeAre#Mission

People, who love the light of the general public consciousness, have good reasons to open up as many of their activities as possible.

As collaboration may be highly valued, even in criminal or terroristic organizations, collaboration might be a "way of life" for these groups too.

Open collaboration of terroristic activities are doomed to "diminish into thin air", due to the power of the majority of internet people, which are good-natured. Aren't we? ;-)

fridemar 04:10, 10 November 2007 (PST)

[edit] Discussion:

OpenBusiness in the Discussion

• print
• 

• Fridemar
• My talk
• My preferences
• My watchlist
• My contributions

what is a wiki? take the:

WhoWeAre:Stage2Status/Fridemar

From AboutUs

Jump to: navigation, search

< WhoWeAre

YES It is an honor to me, to be the second happy Yes-Voter in State 2 of the democratic process of identity forming of AboutUs.Org.

I feel fine with State 2, especially with the following component, which I complemented by "Initiating" and "Practising":

Transparency, Real People

• OpenBusiness processes
• WorkInPublic

So youll soon see another stage in my initiative for OpenBusiness, described by the following tags: SocialDomainTrading, literateMarketing, TransparentDomainPortfolios, DomainSharing, DomainPortfolioSharing, CollaborativeDomainDevelopement, DomainShareBartering, etc. , blogged as say-yes-to-aboutusorg-state-2.html on the SocialCommonWealth.Com

edit

Discussion

Fridemar, ' Kasey and I are attempting to remove "Initiating, Monitoring and Practicing OpenBusiness processes from the WhoWeAre page, but only want to do that if this concept is included in one or more values pages. We're read the Meatball pages on OpenBusiness and Hoofsmith and love what you've done with the WorkInPublic page, and are now wrestling with the OpenBusiness concept. What's the meta for OpenBusiness? Is that a branded term for this kind of doing work? Or is OpenBusiness itself the meta? What do you think? TedErnst | talk 14:49, 5 November 2007 (PST)

Thx Ted for the hint: So I streamlined my above text into OpenBusiness. It goes without saying for me, that only discussing the new paradigm of OpenBusiness (as aplying "radical transparency" to business-processes (to build online trust)) is not enough. We need prototypical projects. See my initiative DomainsToBeDeveloped. Currently I am a lonely pioneer in the pre-alpha state, a caller in the desert. I ask other peers to have the courage to open up their own DomainPortfolios in AboutUs, so that we can interact with LiterateDomainMarketing. A good example could be to initiate a project StocksAtHome.com, using similar distributed software as SetiAtHome.com, motivating programmers to start their job, by pledging them, say 50% of the sold involved domain-names, being paid by risk-capital entrepreneurs. OpenBusiness in this case would imply OpenMails to different programmers and entrepreneurs, perhaps even refining the concept by making explicit the necessary steps and showing and discussing the (OpenSource) resources and benefits for such an endeavour. The rest of the gain from selling StocksAtHome.com and similar domains could be divided between different promoting peers. Even the negotiation process of the partition of the profit could be done in public. OpenBusiness is the meta. [FutureShock] ?

fridemar 14:00, 6 November 2007 (PST) SocialCommonWealth (perma-link work in progress)